Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 317 Ga. 466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “[e]ven assuming ... it was clear error to admit” portions of the appellant’s video-recorded interview at trial, “any error did not affect [his] substantial rights” because the evidence “was harmless in light of the substantial evidence of [his] guilt”
  • explaining that the failure to raise a timely motion for mistrial on the specific grounds challenged on appeal waives for appellate review any alleged error in the trial court’s denial of the motion.
  • “In order to preserve an objection for ordinary appellate review, the specific ground of the objection must be made at the time the challenged evidence is offered.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.