Skip to main content

Kennebrew v. State

Citations

  • 480 S.E.2d 1
  • 267 Ga. 400
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3994
  • 1996 Ga. LEXIS 917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a tape-recorded statement was introduced into evidence when the defendant “played the entire recording,” even if the “tape-recorded statement was not ‘introduced’ as it was not marked for identification or formally tendered into evidence”
  • defendant admitted evidence where he played tape recording even though he did not move the recording into evidence
  • extrajudicial definition of law held prejudicial because information not in accord with state law and referred to sentencing, a matter outside purview of jury
  • witness’s tape-recorded statement played for jury by defense was introduction of evidence even though not formally tendered
  • “trial court erred in addressing the merits of [defendant’s] motion for new trial on the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel without first appointing new counsel”
  • “trial court erred in addressing the merits of [defendant’s] motion for new trial on the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel without first appointing new counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein, Fletcher, Sears, Carley, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kennebrew v. State

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.