Skip to main content

Southall v. State

Citations

  • 300 Ga. 462
  • 796 S.E.2d 261
  • 2017 WL 279518
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating a premature motion for new trial as effectively filed upon entry of the trial court’s judgment does not prejudice the prevailing party
  • overruling statutory-construction precedent that was two sentences long and contained no statutory construction
  • collecting cases and stating that “[t]he word ‘within,’ when used with reference to time, is generally a word of limitation that means ‘not beyond’ or ‘not later than’—fixing the end, but not the beginning, of a period”
  • “[W]ithout more, that we have been wrong for many years is no reason to persist in the error.”
  • precedent about effect of prematurely filed motions for new trial involved only an issue of appellate procedure that did not implicate significant reliance interests
  • “[A]n early motion for new trial or notice of appeal is . . . not legally cognizable before the judgment about which it complains is entered of record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Southall v. State

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.