Supreme Court of Georgia· 2/22/1999
Gibson v. Turpin
Citations
- 513 S.E.2d 186
- 270 Ga. 855
- 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 762
- 1999 Ga. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant has a right to counsel at trial and on direct appeal of right “but no further”
- noting that habeas is “‘not designed as a substitute for direct review’” and that “there is no federal or state constitutional right to appointed counsel in Georgia habeas corpus proceedings” (citation and punctuation omitted)
- denying prisoner’s application for a certificate of probable cause in a twelve-page decision over a dissent because, among other reasons, his attorney’s representation was not deficient
- “Meaningful access does not mean that a state must help inmates discover grievances. . . .It is simply the right of an inmate to raise his claims and be heard.”
- considering claim of ineffective assistance where family members refused to testify
- considering claim of ineffective assistance where family members refused to testify
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hines, Benham, Fletcher, Sears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ClouseColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-08-15· cited 788×
- Gable v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-11-17· cited 154×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-03-15· cited 141×
- Crosson v. ConwaySupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-06-18· cited 94×
- Butts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-04-30· cited 90×
- Fair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-07-14· cited 82×
- Slakman v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-10-06· cited 78×
- Fullwood v. SivleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-01· cited 64×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-11-09· cited 59×
- Fortson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 58×
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-03-09· cited 52×
- Head v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-03-19· cited 47×
- LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-11-24· cited 47×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-03-15· cited 45×
- Waldrip v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 43×
- Wilson v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic PrisonEleventh Circuit· 2016-08-23· cited 34×
- Stubbs v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-03-13· cited 26×
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-06-07· cited 23×
- Schofield v. MedersSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-06-12· cited 18×
- Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-01-13· cited 17×
Cites
99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,488×
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,282×
- California v. RamosSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 1,071×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1996-04-23· cited 861×
- Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 561×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.