Skip to main content

Limeres v. Limeres

Citations

  • 367 P.3d 683
  • 2016 Alas. LEXIS 17
  • 2016 WL 555396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding attorney’s fees issue when superior court granted Rule 82 fee award without giving opposing party opportunity to respond
  • “We use our independent judgment to decide whether it was error not to hold an evidentiary hearing.” (quoting Routh v. Andreassen, 19 P.3d 593, 595 (Alaska 2001))
  • \An abuse of discretion exists when a party has been deprived of a substantial right or seriously prejudiced by the [superior] court's ruling.\ (quoting Limeres v. Limeres , 320 P.3d 291 , 296 (Alaska 2014) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers, Fabe, Winfree, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.