Skip to main content
· 7/2/2015

Moore v. Olson

Citations

  • 351 P.3d 1066
  • 2015 Alas. LEXIS 72
  • 2015 WL 4031624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing grounds for vacating under AS 09.43.500 as arbitration management decisions
  • “[T]he superior court does not exercise appellate jurisdiction over arbitration disputes; rather, the court exercises original jurisdiction over applications to confirm or vacate arbitration awards.”
  • “A superior court’s decision reviewing an arbitration award is subject to de novo review.”
  • \An 'arbitrator's findings of both fact and law ... receive great deference.' \ (omission in original) (quoting OK Lumber Co. v. Alaska R.R. Corp. , 123 P.3d 1076 , 1078 (Alaska 2005) )
  • \[W]hen a party fails to request an evidentiary hearing we will review a court's failure to sua sponte conduct an evidentiary hearing only for plain error.\ (citing In re Estate of Fields , 219 P.3d 995 , 1011 (Alaska 2009

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolger, Fabe, Maassen, Stowers, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.