Alaska Supreme Court· 8/14/2015

Horne v. Touhakis

Citations

356 P.3d 280
2015 Alas. LEXIS 90
2015 WL 4774231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding there were insufficient findings to impute income when “the superior court (1) started with an hourly wage, (2) doubled that wage based on a determination that the parent was capable of earning more, and (3
remanding where “lack of specific findings” precluded appellate review of imputed income determination in child support modification order
noting lack of specific findings to support income imputation order and directing superior court to make findings on “the four factors enumerated in Rule 90.3(a)(4)
noting lack of specific findings to support income imputation order and directing superior court to make findings on (\the four factors enumerated in Rule 90.3(a)(4))\
remanding child support case because superior court’s imputed income findings for obligor were not sufficiently based on evidence and discussing other similar cases
remanding for more detailed factual findings but noting that “the parties failed to provide evidence that would have allowed the superior court to make more detailed findings,” and that “[t]he parties bear responsibility for this dearth of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.