Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 12/17/1985

John Doe v. Joseph Digenova

Citations

  • 779 F.2d 74
  • 250 U.S. App. D.C. 274
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • basing holding on analysis of similar language in Fair Credit Reporting Act and similar statutes, and on purposes of Privacy Act
  • “[C]ourts have properly been reluctant to address an issue where the opposing party has not had a fair and adequate opportunity to dispute the material is sues.”
  • “When the issue has, through no fault of the parties, not 17 been briefed or argued in any forum, the appropriate disposition is typically to remand the case to the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Edwards, Starr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.