· 1/16/1996
Roger Pilon v. United States Department of Justice
Citations
- 73 F.3d 1111
- 315 U.S. App. D.C. 329
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 465
- 1996 WL 13061
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Privacy Act “establishes conditions under which certain kinds of agency documents must be kept private and may be disclosed only to authorized individuals”
- collecting definitions from dictionaries and other statutes indicating that “disclose” in the Privacy Act “encompass[es] the act of exposing or disseminating an item”
- “[I]n interpreting the terms of the Privacy Act specifically, we have in the past taken particular care not to undermine the Act’s fundamental goals.”
- “[I]n interpreting the terms of the Privacy Act specifically, we have in the past taken particular care not to undermine the Act’s fundamental goals.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Randolph, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.