John Doe v. Jay B. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disclosing medical records pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was an invalid “routine use” because it would not be for a compatible purpose
• denying injunctive relief under the Privacy Act but making no mention of the Declaratory Judgment Act
• hold- ing that aside from two specific subsections, the Privacy Act \pre- cludes other forms of declaratory and injunctive relief\
• dismissing plaintiff’s Privacy Act claim for injunctive relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).