Donoghue v. Office of Information Policy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Donoghue could not expand the scope of his FOIA/Privacy Act action to address constitutional criminal procedure claims
• finding that plaintiffs “unsupported speculation does not overcome the defendants’ showing that its manual and automated searches] of the CRS using variations of the plaintiffs name as search terms were reasonably calculated to locate responsive records”
• denying plaintiff’s request to expand scope of civil action to include three additional agencies where complaint pertained to single FOIA request to a single agency
• declining to address the FBI’s reliance on Exemption 7(E) where the requester “did not seek information as to the existence of his name on a watch list . . . or request information about investigative techniques or methods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).