Paul v. Verniero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellants’ privacy interest claim based on the disclosure of information to those who have a particular need for it must fail
• ruling that \arrest records and related information are not protected by a right to privacy\
• noting that appellants filed several motions “seeking to supplement the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).