John Doe, Xiv v. Michigan Department of State Police and Col. Tadarial Sturdivant, Director, Michigan State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “stigma-plus” test only applies to procedural due process claims
• noting that “[t]his court has previously concluded that the state’s interests in protecting public safety and in aiding effective law enforcement are advanced by the SORA’s registration requirements”
• holding, with some reservations, that (1
• “We evaluate statutes that do not implicate a [person’s] fundamental rights by utilizing a rational-basis standard of review.”
• “The stigma-plus test is used to determine whether state action violates an individual’s procedural due process rights.”
• “Our review of the caselaw has failed to identify any case that applies the stigma-plus test to a substantive due process claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).