United States v. Ambert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal sex-offender registration requirements are “rationally related to Congress’ legitimate goal in protecting the public from recidivist sex offenders”
• rejecting SORNA due process claim because offender received due process protections in his underlying criminal proceedings
• “Section 16913 is reasonably adapted to the attainment of a legitimate end under the commerce clause.”
• \[T]he government's interest in protecting others from future sexual offenses and preventing sex offenders from subverting the purpose of the statute is sufficiently weighty to overcome the burden.\
• cited favorably by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254, 264 (5th Cir. 2009)
• “[T]he 14 government’s interest in protecting others from future sexual offenses and 15 preventing sex offenders from subverting the purpose of the statute is 16 sufficiently weighty to overcome the burden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).