Eleventh Circuit· 3/6/2009

United States v. Ambert

Citations

561 F.3d 1202
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5275
2009 WL 564677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that federal sex-offender registration requirements are “rationally related to Congress’ legitimate goal in protecting the public from recidivist sex offenders”
rejecting SORNA due process claim because offender received due process protections in his underlying criminal proceedings
“Section 16913 is reasonably adapted to the attainment of a legitimate end under the commerce clause.”
\[T]he government's interest in protecting others from future sexual offenses and preventing sex offenders from subverting the purpose of the statute is sufficiently weighty to overcome the burden.\
cited favorably by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254, 264 (5th Cir. 2009)
“[T]he 14 government’s interest in protecting others from future sexual offenses and 15 preventing sex offenders from subverting the purpose of the statute is 16 sufficiently weighty to overcome the burden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Anderson, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.