J.M. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Florida Supreme Court and the District Courts of Appeal in this state have routinely held that Miranda does not apply to questions designed to obtain basic booking information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Tobiassen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-08· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Pennsylvania v. Muniz
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
• Holland v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 37×
• Allred v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-07-01· cited 31×
• State v. McAdams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-19· cited 26×
• Timmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-01· cited 14×
• Avila v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-20· cited 7×