District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/20/1989
Avila v. State
Citations
- 545 So. 2d 450
- 1989 WL 65874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a question aimed at discovering the real name of a defendant is not an interrogation within the scope of Miranda
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barkdull, Jorgenson and Gersten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 37×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-29· cited 17×
- Parnell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-07· cited 5×
- Holland v. TuckerS.D. Florida· 2012-04-03· cited 4×
- J.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-05· cited 1×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-04· cited 1×
- JM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-05
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 757×
- Sireci v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-10· cited 158×
- Hall v. BlakeSupreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 150×
- Correll v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-14· cited 104×
- Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-10· cited 98×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.