District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/19/1990
State v. McAdams
Citations
- 559 So. 2d 601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that basic identification data, such as name, age, current address, and social security number, is not generally subject to Miranda
- holding that basic identification data, such as name, age, current address, and social security number, is not generally subject to Miranda
- recording of conversation between two defendants in police car after defendants had invoked constitutional rights not illegal
- appellees had no expectation of privacy in conversation held in backseat of police cruiser despite exercise of right to remain silent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-11· cited 127×
- State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-03-08· cited 79×
- United States v. Steve McKinnonEleventh Circuit· 1993-03-09· cited 64×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-16· cited 55×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 37×
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-08-30· cited 21×
- Lopez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-09· cited 21×
- Meyer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-08-21· cited 16×
- Timmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-01· cited 14×
- Springle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-13· cited 10×
- State v. FosterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-31· cited 10×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-29· cited 9×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-05-25· cited 5×
- Holland v. TuckerS.D. Florida· 2012-04-03· cited 4×
- Warren v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. WatermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-05· cited 3×
- Boyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-02· cited 3×
- State v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-31· cited 2×
- J.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-05· cited 1×
- Cuomo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-24· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Hines v. J. E. Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, NewyorkSecond Circuit· 1975-08-13· cited 120×
- Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1961-03-29· cited 65×
- Bernotas v. Chester County Water Resources AuthoritySupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 35×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-12· cited 28×
- State v. CalhounDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-04· cited 25×
- State v. McInnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-09-12· cited 17×
- DiGuilio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-29· cited 14×
- State v. McLaughlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-05· cited 11×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-13· cited 11×
- Safeco Ins. Co. v. RochowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-30· cited 10×
- State v. FergusonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-11-04· cited 10×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-02· cited 7×
- State v. SotoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-09· cited 4×
- State v. H.M. Bowness Oil, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.