Bryan F. Jennings v. James McDonough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that none of the Supreme Court decisions regarding this issue “squarely addresses the issue of federal district courts conducting harmless error review in place of state courts”
• noting that none of the Supreme Court decisions regarding this issue \squarely addresses the issue of federal district courts conducting harmless error review in place of state courts\
• explaining that “[t]he Strickland standard of objective reasonableness does not depend on the subjective intentions of the attorney, judgments made in hindsight, or an attorney’s admission of deficient performance”
• explaining that “[t]he Strickland standard of objective reasonableness does not depend on the subjective intentions of the attorney, judgments made in hindsight, or an attorney’s admission of deficient performance”
• “[t]he prejudice prong of Strickland incorporates the same standard used for assessing the materiality of evidence under Brady”
• “The Strickland standard of objective reasonableness does not depend on the subjective intentions of the attorney, judgments made in hindsight, or an attorney’s admission of deficient performance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).