Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/23/2010

Jenkins v. Greene

Citations

  • 630 F.3d 298
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 26090
  • 2010 WL 5186019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in 3 habeas context, court of appeals reviews district court’s “factual finding[s]” as to 4 circumstances of original state court sentencing “for clear error”
  • “[T]he doctrine of equitable tolling does not permit . . . tolling whenever a petitioner must face the daunting procedural obstacles to obtaining habeas review without the assistance of counsel.”
  • “With respect to the second prong, a defendant’s statements that he would have accepted a plea offer in combination with some objective evidence, such as a significant sentencing disparity, is sufficient to support a prejudice finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Livingston, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jenkins v. Greene

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.