United States v. Gerald Gordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sentencing “disparity provides sufficient objective evidence—when combined with a petitioner’s statement concerning his intentions—to support a finding of prejudice under Strickland ”
• holding that a dis- trict court’s order granting a successful § 2255 petitioner a new trial is immediately appealable
• holding that sentencing \disparity provides sufficient objective evidence — when combined with a petitioner’s statement concerning his intentions — to support a finding of prejudice under Strickland\
• holding that disparity between counsel’s description of sentence exposure and actual sentence “provides sufficient objective evidence —when combined with a petitioner’s statement concerning his intentions—to support a finding of prejudice under Strickland ”
• holding defendant did not receive effective assistance at post-indictment plea negotiations when counsel seriously underestimated his exposure at sentencing
• finding that the large disparity between actual sentence and sentence that defendant’s counsel represented he would

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).