Second Circuit· 9/22/1998

United States v. Gerald Gordon

Citations

156 F.3d 376
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23316
1998 WL 647149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that sentencing “disparity provides sufficient objective evidence—when combined with a petitioner’s statement concerning his intentions—to support a finding of prejudice under Strickland ”
holding that a dis- trict court’s order granting a successful § 2255 petitioner a new trial is immediately appealable
holding that sentencing \disparity provides sufficient objective evidence — when combined with a petitioner’s statement concerning his intentions — to support a finding of prejudice under Strickland\
holding that disparity between counsel’s description of sentence exposure and actual sentence “provides sufficient objective evidence —when combined with a petitioner’s statement concerning his intentions—to support a finding of prejudice under Strickland ”
holding defendant did not receive effective assistance at post-indictment plea negotiations when counsel seriously underestimated his exposure at sentencing
finding that the large disparity between actual sentence and sentence that defendant’s counsel represented he would

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Parker, Eginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

167 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.