Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a posted tip credit notice “constitutes sufficient notice only if the content of the poster is otherwise sufficient and it is prominently displayed” (citation omitted)
• finding a period of three months was too attenuated to establish a causal connection under Section 215
• granting summary judgment when a witness testified that the posted material discussed the minimum wage and was posted across from the locker room
• finding general manager of a restaurant to be employer for FLSA purposes when manager was “eyes and ears” for restaurant owner
• finding plaintiffs did not satisfy the first Carter factor by offering testimony that defendant sometimes made recommendations on hiring because ultimately, the employer was free to disregard such recommendations.
• determining Defendants had not satisfied the good faith exception where the purpose of a consultation with an accountant was not to determine compliance with the FLSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).