Seventh Circuit· 11/7/2011

Jelinek v. Astrue

Citations

662 F.3d 805
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22502
2011 WL 5319852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a claimant’s “brief, part-time employment” did not support the conclusion “that she was able to work a full-time job, week in and week out, given her limitations”
noting that an ALJ “would be hard-pressed to justify casting aside [a treater’s] opinion in favor of [sic] earlier state-agency opinions”
explaining that, under the “treating physician rule,” the opinion of a treating physician “that is consistent with the record is generally entitled to ‘controlling weight’”
stating that “bipolar disorder . . . is by nature episodic and admits to regular fluctuations even under proper treatment”
explaining that, under the “treating physician rule,” the opinion of a treating physician “that is consistent with the record is generally entitled to ‘controlling weight’”
explaining that the opinion of a treating physician “that is consistent with the record is generally entitled to ‘controlling weight’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Sykes, and Hamilton, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.