Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/12/2012

Smith v. Astrue

Citations

  • 467 F. App'x 507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the Commissioner’s “post hoc rationalization” of the ALJ’s RFC analysis because “‘what matters are the reasons articulated by the ALJ,’ not the rationale advanced by the government on appeal” (quoting Jelinek v. Astrue, 662 F.3d 805, 812 (7th Cir. 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.