Seventh Circuit· 3/12/2012
Smith v. Astrue
Citations
- 467 F. App'x 507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the Commissioner’s “post hoc rationalization” of the ALJ’s RFC analysis because “‘what matters are the reasons articulated by the ALJ,’ not the rationale advanced by the government on appeal” (quoting Jelinek v. Astrue, 662 F.3d 805, 812 (7th Cir. 2011
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 3,975×
- Craft v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2008-08-22· cited 1,627×
- Roberta Skinner v. Michael J. Astrue, CommissionerSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-07· cited 1,137×
- O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2010-11-29· cited 784×
- McKinzey v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2011-06-03· cited 730×
- Parker v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2010-03-12· cited 715×
- Scott v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-01· cited 694×
- Jelinek v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2011-11-07· cited 691×
- Christine Bjornson v. Michael AstruSeventh Circuit· 2012-01-31· cited 660×
- Nelms v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2009-01-28· cited 407×
- Stewart v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2009-04-02· cited 396×
- Spiva v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 379×
- Schaaf v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2010-04-26· cited 352×
- Martinez v. AstrueSeventh Circuit· 2011-01-19· cited 285×
- Justin Nelson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social SecuritySeventh Circuit· 1997-12-15· cited 133×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.