Schaaf v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the ALJ was entitled to infer that [claimant] would have told his doctors if he was experiencing excruciating pain”
• holding that subjective reports in treatment notes did not compel ALJ to accept treating source report that the claimant could not sustain full-time work
• explaining that an ALJ \must give a good reason\ for rejecting a treating physician's opinion
• explaining that an ALJ “must give a good reason” for rejecting a treating physician’s opin‐ ion
• explaining that an ALJ “must give a good reason” for rejecting a treating physician’s opin‐ ion
• explaining that an ALJ “must give a good reason” for rejecting a treating physician’s opin‐ ion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).