Ninth Circuit· 4/23/2004
Jeff D. v. Kempthorne
Citations
- 365 F.3d 844
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- consent decree valid where it “came within the general scope of the pleadings and furthered the objectives upon which the complaint was based”
- “Because consent decrees are considered final judgments we have jurisdiction to-review'the claims raised in the-motion to vacate the consent descrees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .” (citatidn omitted)
- “Those decisions made clear that federal courts can enforce 22 consent decrees which require state officials to do more than what federal law demands even 23 without a showing of an ongoing violation of federal law.”
- “[C]onsent decrees are considered final judgments . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Andrews v. KingNinth Circuit· 2005-02-10· cited 1,281×
- LAL v. CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2010-06-25· cited 130×
- Armstrong v. SchwarzeneggerNinth Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 128×
- United States v. Asarco Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2005-12-05· cited 77×
- Robert Griffin v. James GomezNinth Circuit· 2014-01-28· cited 41×
- Rains v. Flinn (In Re Rains)Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-07· cited 39×
- Wicker v. Oregon Ex Rel. Bureau of LaborNinth Circuit· 2008-09-17· cited 17×
- Marciano Plata v. Edmund Brown, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-05-28· cited 12×
- Bennett v. American Medical Response, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-27· cited 7×
- Valdivia v. SchwarzeneggerE.D. California· 2009-03-26· cited 2×
- Emily Q ex rel. Kay R v. ShrewyNinth Circuit· 2006-10-02· cited 2×
- Retamco Operating, Inc. v. CaroneNinth Circuit· 2008-02-20· cited 1×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 2,261×
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-01-12· cited 2,130×
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,703×
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,152×
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 850×
- Suter v. Artist M.Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 620×
- Frew Ex Rel. Frew v. HawkinsSupreme Court· 2004-01-14· cited 564×
- Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 504×
- Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 276×
- Will Stone v. City And County Of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 1992-08-25· cited 136×
- Al K. Plotkin, and Gerald Kilgore, Individually and Dba Jk Sports Journal v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1982-09-29· cited 117×
- Sylvia Evans, Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Evans v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1993-11-24· cited 85×
- United States v. Alejandro Ceja-PradoNinth Circuit· 2003-06-25· cited 81×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan Marvin BERKE, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1999-03-16· cited 70×
- Taag Linhas Aereas De Angola v. Transamerica Airlines, Inc., Transamerica Corporation, H.K. Howard, William Maier, Joseph Murphy, Eric J. KorthNinth Circuit· 1990-12-27· cited 63×
- Jeff D. v. AndrusEighth Circuit· 1989-10-23· cited 60×
- Raymond Washington v. Clayton PenwellNinth Circuit· 1983-03-03· cited 57×
- Keith v. VolpeNinth Circuit· 1997-07-09· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.