Ninth Circuit· 6/25/2003
United States v. Alejandro Ceja-Prado
Citations
- 333 F.3d 1046
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5513
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 6977
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining jurisdictional nature and certification requirement of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act
- explaining jurisdictional nature and certification requirement of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act
- “[O]ur obligation to investigate and ensure our own jurisdiction overrides the equitable or jurisprudential considerations that might otherwise prevent [the defendant] from raising new and contradictory evidence at this point.”
- “[O]ur obligation to investigate and ensure our own jurisdiction overrides the equitable or jurisprudential considerations that might otherwise prevent [the defendant] from raising new and contradictory evidence at this point.”
- “It is clear, for example, that this court has a continuing obligation to assess its own subject-matter jurisdiction, even if the issue is neglected by the parties entirely or raised for the first time on appeal.”
- “[T]his court has a continuing obligation to assess its own subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Fletcher, Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & SuitesNinth Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 201×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2004-02-17· cited 137×
- United States v. BlakeFourth Circuit· 2009-07-02· cited 94×
- Mr. Julien Michel Belleri v. USAEleventh Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 57×
- International Union of Operating Engineers v. County of PlumasNinth Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 53×
- Jeff D. v. KempthorneNinth Circuit· 2004-04-23· cited 34×
- United States v. Victoria L. RayNinth Circuit· 2004-07-23· cited 28×
- United States v. John Doe, a JuvenileNinth Circuit· 2004-05-11· cited 26×
- Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PlcNinth Circuit· 2007-04-11· cited 26×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2006-08-07· cited 16×
- Jose Catalino Guzman-Andrade v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-05-19· cited 15×
- Aguirre v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03· cited 15×
- Casey Ruud, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Intervenor v. U.S. Department of Labor Westinghouse Hanford CompanyNinth Circuit· 2003-10-22· cited 7×
- Allstate Insurance v. HughesNinth Circuit· 2003-10-08· cited 7×
- United States v. Juvenile MaleNinth Circuit· 2003-07-23· cited 5×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2007-04-12· cited 1×
- Sarei v. Rio Rinto, PlcNinth Circuit· 2006-08-07· cited 1×
- United States v. C.L.T.D. South Dakota· 2016-09-09· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2003-10-08
- Guzman-Andrade v. GonzalesNinth Circuit· 2005-05-18
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 2,475×
- Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyNinth Circuit· 2003-02-03· cited 870×
- Donald H. Albrecht, and Joanne Albrecht v. William S. LundNinth Circuit· 1988-04-26· cited 552×
- Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenNinth Circuit· 1999-09-14· cited 526×
- Schnabel v. LuiNinth Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 91×
- Kenneth Richardson Norman J. Trapp v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1991-08-30· cited 76×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, a Juvenile Male, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1999-03-17· cited 65×
- Holman v. Laulo-Rowe AgencyNinth Circuit· 1993-05-24· cited 65×
- Florence O'CampO v. Edna Hardisty, Paul H. Wright, R. v. Rushford, N. P. Hughes and N. DrakulichNinth Circuit· 1958-12-31· cited 64×
- American States Insurance Company v. Dastar CorporationNinth Circuit· 2003-01-22· cited 59×
- United States v. Antonio Frasquillo-ZomosaNinth Circuit· 1980-09-11· cited 41×
- Itel Containers International Corp. v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1985-10-29· cited 39×
- Earle A. Partington v. Joseph M. Gedan Howard T. ChangNinth Circuit· 1991-01-11· cited 34×
- In Re MooneyNinth Circuit· 1988-03-15· cited 31×
- In Re: Sealed CaseD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-19· cited 30×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, Defendant-Appellant. (Two Cases)Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-11· cited 22×
- Kenneth D. Hajek v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation Montana Rail Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 19×
- United States v. Salgado-OcampoD. Minnesota· 1999-06-16· cited 15×
- United States v. Charles WilliamsSecond Circuit· 1971-04-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.