United States v. Alejandro Ceja-Prado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining jurisdictional nature and certification requirement of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act
• explaining jurisdictional nature and certification requirement of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act
• “[O]ur obligation to investigate and ensure our own jurisdiction overrides the equitable or jurisprudential considerations that might otherwise prevent [the defendant] from raising new and contradictory evidence at this point.”
• “[O]ur obligation to investigate and ensure our own jurisdiction overrides the equitable or jurisprudential considerations that might otherwise prevent [the defendant] from raising new and contradictory evidence at this point.”
• “It is clear, for example, that this court has a continuing obligation to assess its own subject-matter jurisdiction, even if the issue is neglected by the parties entirely or raised for the first time on appeal.”
• “[T]his court has a continuing obligation to assess its own subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).