Raymond Washington v. Clayton Penwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a four-year delay was not unreasonable
• remanding to district court for failing to analyze compliance with one of several obligations in a consent decree
• remanding to district court for failing to analyze compliance with one of several obligations in a consent decree
• “The funding provision was not intended to bind the individuals, but rather the state, something it could not do under the Eleventh Amendment.”
• “If general legal services for prisoners were required by the Constitution, we might be able to enforce this provision, notwithstanding the state’s protest.”
• Fed. R. Civ. E 60(b) motion timely when it was filed four years after entry of consent decree, but only two months after trial court’s finding regarding parties’ compliance with decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).