United States v. Asarco Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that burden is on the moving party
• “A court should not ordinarily modify a decree, however, ‘where a party relies upon events that actually were anticipated at the time it entered into a decree.’” (simplified)
• “[C]ourts treat consent decrees as contracts for enforcement pur- poses.”
• Rule 60(b) motions are reviewed for abuse of discretion
• summarizing and applying these rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).