· 6/26/1906
Studer v. State
Citations
- 74 Ohio St. (N.S.) 519
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming this court’s outright rejection of a taxpayer’s claim purportedly based on Equal Protection violations and implied contracts of unspecified origin
- further observing that the doctrine of claim preclusion is sometimes specified by the term “res judicata,” but using “claim preclusion” instead of “the more ambiguous term ‘res judicata,’” as the latter can sometimes contemplate ei- ther claim preclusion or issue preclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Price, Shauck, Summers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.