· 4/12/2005
United States v. Stefan E. Brodie
Citations
- 403 F.3d 123
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5944
- 2005 WL 831817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the very nature of the crime of conspiracy is such that it often may be established only by indirect and circumstantial evidence”
- considering evidence of the nature of the relationships between businessmen, and the defendant's hands-on management style in evaluating adequacy of the evidence of a conspiratorial agreement
- considering evidence of the nature of the relationships between businessmen, and the defendant’s hands-on management style in evaluating adequacy of the evidence of a conspiratorial agreement
- “In conducting the sufficiency inquiry, we do not view the government’s evidence in isolation, but rather, in conjunction and as a whole.”
- “[WJe do not view the government’s evidence in isolation, but rather, in conjunction and as a whole.”
- “[WJe do not view the government’s evidence in isolation, but rather, in conjunction and as a whole.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKee, Fisher, Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.