Skip to main content
· 4/12/2005

United States v. Stefan E. Brodie

Citations

  • 403 F.3d 123
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5944
  • 2005 WL 831817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the very nature of the crime of conspiracy is such that it often may be established only by indirect and circumstantial evidence”
  • considering evidence of the nature of the relationships between businessmen, and the defendant's hands-on management style in evaluating adequacy of the evidence of a conspiratorial agreement
  • considering evidence of the nature of the relationships between businessmen, and the defendant’s hands-on management style in evaluating adequacy of the evidence of a conspiratorial agreement
  • “In conducting the sufficiency inquiry, we do not view the government’s evidence in isolation, but rather, in conjunction and as a whole.”
  • “[WJe do not view the government’s evidence in isolation, but rather, in conjunction and as a whole.”
  • “[WJe do not view the government’s evidence in isolation, but rather, in conjunction and as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Fisher, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.