United States v. Bansal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n indictment must include the facts and circumstances comprising at least three felonies, but ... the CCE count itself need not identify with exacting specificity which three will ultimately prove the CCE charge.”
• warrant that authorized search of “premises” at address authorized search of detached garage
• applying plain error review to an unpreserved statutory interpretation issue
• rejecting contention that Rule 41(b) trumps § 2703(a)
• finding Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).