Skip to main content

Stevens v. People

Citations

  • 52 V.I. 294
  • 2009 WL 2984057
  • 2009 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no abuse of discretion when Superior Court failed to act as a thirteenth juror
  • stating that “[e]ven if it were true, as asserted by the [appellant], that much of the People’s evidence was laden with inconsistencies, the uncorroborated testimony of the victim would have been sufficient to sustain the convictions.”
  • adopting the same standard of review as the federal courts for the denial of a motion for a new trial because the rules are so similar
  • “Thus, [the victim’s] identification of Stevens as the shooter, which was credited by the Superior Court, and obviously the jury as well, provided a sufficient basis to deny Stevens’s challenge to the weight of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Designated, Hodge, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.