United States v. Bishop Capers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Franks had been extended to affidavits submitted in support of a wiretap
• explaining that when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we “consider[] the evidence in the light most favorable to the [g]overnment, and draw[] all reasonable inferences and credibility choices” in the government’s favor
• explaining a defendant’s substantial rights must be affected to warrant relief under the cumulative error doctrine
• describing the circumstances under which a court might compel disclosure of information protected by the constitutional privilege
• deeming the cumu- lative effect of minor errors “harmless, given the length of the trial, and the strength of the government’s case”
• reviewing a district court’s decision not to grant a mistrial for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).