Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/5/1981
Leach v. State
Citations
- 425 A.2d 234
- 47 Md. App. 611
- 1981 Md. App. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to strike a juror, who upon cross-examination at trial, was discovered to be an old neighbor and acquaintance of a State’s witness when the trial judge was satisfied that the juror had no bias
- refusing to strike a juror, who upon cross-examination at trial, was discovered to be an old neighbor and acquaintance of a State's witness when the trial judge was satisfied that the juror had no bias
- during voir dire, juror failed to disclose her acquaintanceship with a State witness, who was a homicide detective; the omission was discovered on cross-examination; in its discretion, trial court was entitled to accept juror’s assurance that she could serve without bias
- affirming the refusal to strike a juror, who upon cross-examination at trial, was discovered to be an old neighbor and acquaintance of a State's witness when the trial judge was satisfied that the juror had no bias and Burkett v. State, 21 Md.App. 438, 445, 319 A.2d 845, 849 (1974
- affirming the refusal to strike a juror, who upon cross-examination at trial, was discovered to be an old neighbor and acquaintance of a State's witness when the trial judge was satisfied that the juror had no bias and Burkett v. State, 21 Md.App. 438, 445, 319 A.2d 845, 849 (1974
- “[I]t is in the sole discretion of the trial judge to have portions of the transcript read to the jury when requested under Maryland Rule [4-326(c) ].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morton, Liss, Weant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-05· cited 70×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-06· cited 29×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-03· cited 27×
- People v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-06-05· cited 17×
- Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-03· cited 16×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-07· cited 11×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-28· cited 6×
- Leckliter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-05-06
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-25· cited 201×
- Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-18· cited 112×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-05-13· cited 112×
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-10-20· cited 49×
- Veney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-15· cited 43×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-06-30· cited 35×
- Baldwin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-19· cited 34×
- Avery v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-30· cited 34×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-11· cited 30×
- Bing Fa Yuen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-12· cited 28×
- Leuschner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-08· cited 22×
- Lapelosa v. CruzeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-11-13· cited 20×
- Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-09-07· cited 19×
- Burkett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-28· cited 18×
- Offutt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-07· cited 15×
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-01-11· cited 13×
- Jamison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1956-12-05· cited 8×
- Smith v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.