Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 301 Ga. 866
  • 804 S.E.2d 367
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, in case applying new Evidence Code, that “an investigating officer may not testify about what others told him during his investigation merely under the guise of explaining the officer’s conduct”
  • noting, in case applying new Evidence Code, that “an investigating officer may not testify about what others told him during his investigation merely under the guise of explaining the officer’s conduct”
  • “[T]he State was not required to produce any physical evidence, and it was for the jury to determine the credibility of the eyewitnesses.”
  • “[A]n investigating officer may not testify about what others told him during his investigation merely under the guise of explaining the officer’s conduct.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[A]n investigating officer may not testify about what oth- ers told him during his investigation merely under the guise of explaining the officer’s conduct.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • Rule of Completeness “permits introduction only of 7 additional material that is relevant and is necessary to qualify, explain, or place into context the portion already introduced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.