Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 294 Ga. 560
  • 755 S.E.2d 160
  • 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 288
  • 2014 WL 695241
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no showing of prejudice where appellate counsel failed to call witnesses who were other potential suspects to testify on motion for new trial
  • Counsel’s strategic decisions, such as which witnesses to present, “do not amount to deficient performance unless they are so unreasonable that no competent attorney would have made them under similar circumstances”
  • “[T]he extent of cross-examination [is a matter] of trial strategy and tactics, and such strategic and tactical decisions do not amount to deficient performance unless they are so unreasonable that no competent attorney would have made them under similar circumstances.”
  • “As we have explained, when trial counsel does not testify at the motion for new trial hearing about the subject, it is extremely difficult to overcome the presumption that his conduct was reasonable.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.