Skip to main content

Thompson v. State

Citations

  • 816 S.E.2d 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a detective’s testimony that she believed that the defendant was the shooter “would have come as no surprise to the jury” because she obtained a warrant for the defendant’s arrest
  • holding that the appellant failed to show prejudice from his counsel’s decision not to move to strike the juror for cause because “there is no indication that a challenge for cause would have been successful”
  • concluding that the appellant had not shown that the challenged testimony probably affected the outcome of his trial under the third part of the plain error test, because the testimony was not particularly prejudicial and the other evidence of his guilt was compelling
  • “‘[S]uch comments upon the patently obvious generally pose little, if any, danger of prejudice.’” (citation omitted)
  • a detective’s opinion testimony indicating she believed appellant to be the shooter “did not violate the ultimate issue rule in the new Evidence Code”
  • “Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.