Skip to main content

Allaben v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 253
  • 787 S.E.2d 711
  • 2016 WL 3390435
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that two post-incision autopsy photographs, including a close-up photograph detailing the victim’s injuries, “were not more prejudicial than probative” under OCGA § 24-4-403
  • noting that we review a ruling under the rule of completeness for abuse of discretion
  • Rule of Completeness “permits introduction only of additional material that is relevant and is necessary to qualify, explain, or place into context the portion already introduced”
  • Rule of Completeness “permits introduction only of additional material that is relevant and is necessary to qualify, explain, or place into context the portion already introduced”
  • pursuant to the “rule of completeness,” if “part of a conversation is introduced, all that is said in the same conversation which is relevant to the issue should be admitted” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “A trial court’s refusal to give a jury charge in the exact language requested by a defendant is not error if the charge given by the trial court substantially covers the applicable principles of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.