Supreme Court of Georgia· 2/16/2015
Parker v. State
Citations
- 296 Ga. 586
- 769 S.E.2d 329
- 2015 Ga. LEXIS 133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- saying that “where the new Georgia rules [of evidence] mirror their federal counterparts, it is clear that the General Assembly intended for Georgia courts to look to the federal rules and how federal appellate courts have interpreted those rules for guidance”
- saying that “where the new Georgia rules [of evidence] mirror their federal counterparts, it is clear that the General Assembly intended for Georgia courts to look to the federal rules and how federal appellate courts have interpreted those rules for guidance”
- noting absence of catch-all provision in corresponding federal rule of evidence indicated intent of Georgia legislature to create an exclusive list
- addressing whether the rules of evidence apply to a proceeding for issuance of a material witness certificate under the out-of-state witness act
- “Thus, not every discrepancy between the wording of the new Evidence Code and the version of the Federal Rules of Evidence that was in effect on January 1, 2013, signifies a different meaning.”
- “[W]here the new Georgia rules mirror their federal counterparts, it is clear that the General Assembly intended for Georgia courts to look to the federal rules and how federal appellate courts have interpreted those rules for guidance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nahmias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-06-06· cited 127×
- Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-23· cited 115×
- State v. AlmanzaSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-10-09· cited 98×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-02-04· cited 79×
- State v. ChulpayevSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-27· cited 64×
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-06-15· cited 60×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-09· cited 57×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 44×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-30· cited 34×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-21· cited 28×
- Silvey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-11-23· cited 26×
- Patton v. VanterpoolSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-16· cited 26×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-11-16· cited 25×
- Bolling v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-03-06· cited 25×
- Post v. State v. State v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-11-16· cited 21×
- The STATE v. McPHERSONCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-05-09· cited 21×
- Revere v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-09-13· cited 21×
- Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-03-05· cited 20×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-08-28· cited 19×
- Gaskin v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-11-23· cited 18×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 214×
- Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-03-10· cited 81×
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 41×
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-06-20· cited 39×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-03-23· cited 33×
- Flading v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-22· cited 20×
- In Re State of California for the County of Los AngelesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-06· cited 19×
- Yeary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-06-20· cited 17×
- Cronkite v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-07-01· cited 13×
- Wollesen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-02-10· cited 10×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.