Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 824 S.E.2d 326
  • 305 Ga. 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance analysis is equivalent to the test for harm in plain error review” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[T]he test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance analysis is equivalent to the test for harm in plain error review.”
  • “Even if opportunity could be inferred, nothing linked this third party to the murder.” (cleaned up)
  • “[T]he test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance analysis is equivalent to the test for harm in plain error review.”
  • “[I]t was for the jury to determine the credibility of the eyewitnesses.”
  • plain error review established in OCGA § 17-8-57 (b) applies retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.