Skip to main content

Cromartie v. State

Citations

  • 70 So. 3d 559
  • 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 473
  • 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1968
  • 2011 WL 3715074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial judge’s arbitrary sentencing policy was fundamental error
  • holding the trial court’s stated policy of rounding up the sentence was a fundamental error because it improperly extended incarceration in an arbitrary manner
  • stating that a violation of due process is a pure question of law
  • noting that where there is no contemporaneous objection and where error cannot be raised in a rule 3.800(b) motion, the error can be remedied on appeal if the error is fundamental
  • reversing for fundamental error because the trial court refused to consider a legislatively-authorized sentencing option as a matter of general policy
  • invalidating sentence entered under a judge’s stated policy of always rounding sentences up to the next whole year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Quince, Labarga, Perry, Pariente, Canady, Polston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.