Skip to main content

Fernandez v. State

Citations

  • 212 So. 3d 494
  • 2017 WL 788407
  • 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State failed to carry its burden where sentencing court specifically referred to the new offense during sentencing
  • holding that consideration of a constitutionally impermissible sentencing factor may amount to fundamental error
  • holding that the trial court improperly relied on a subsequent charge in sentencing where the trial court stated she was imposing the sentence “based on the fact that you re-offended” among other reasons
  • remanding for resentencing before a different judge when the trial court considered impermissible factors at sentencing
  • \[C]onsideration of a constitutionally impermissible sentencing factor is a fundamental error in the sentencing process.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salario, Khouzam, Lucas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.