Skip to main content

Odom v. State

Citations

  • 15 So. 3d 672
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8750
  • 2009 WL 1782987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “‘the language used in a condition of probation is determinative of a probationer’s duties and responsibilities while on probation.’”
  • holding that the probation officer's instruction that Odom meet with her at her office within the first five days of each month was a reasonable and necessary procedure for implementing the meeting requirement clearly set forth in the written conditions of probation
  • differentiating between “new, special” conditions imposed by probation supervisor and those imposed by the sentencing court
  • “Reasonable efforts to comply with a condition of probation cannot be deemed a willful violation.”
  • “Because ability to pay is an essential element for a finding that a probationer willfully violated probation for failure to pay supervisory costs, the revocation of Appellant’s probation based on the alleged violation . . . constitutes fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Hawkes, Van Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.