S.D. New York· 3/21/2006

In re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

235 F.R.D. 220
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13226
2006 WL 759751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding a class period end date occurred the date prior to the disclosure
involving particularized confidential-witness allegations that attributed knowledge of specific issues to specific individual defendants
“[A] failure to maintain sufficient internal controls to avoid fraud is sufficiently indicative of scienter.”
“Pursuant to the judicially-created ‘bespeaks caution’ doctrine, certain alleged misrepresentations, which are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements, are considered immaterial as a matter of law.”
plaintiffs alleged that the subject company’s “accounting department was dramatically reduced,” allowing “defendants to conceal accounting improprieties and false financial reporting”
the bespeaks caution doctrine “applies only where the cautionary language is reasonably specific as opposed to generic or boilerplate so as to constitute a real warning to investors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMahon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.