In re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a class period end date occurred the date prior to the disclosure
• involving particularized confidential-witness allegations that attributed knowledge of specific issues to specific individual defendants
• “[A] failure to maintain sufficient internal controls to avoid fraud is sufficiently indicative of scienter.”
• “Pursuant to the judicially-created ‘bespeaks caution’ doctrine, certain alleged misrepresentations, which are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements, are considered immaterial as a matter of law.”
• plaintiffs alleged that the subject company’s “accounting department was dramatically reduced,” allowing “defendants to conceal accounting improprieties and false financial reporting”
• the bespeaks caution doctrine “applies only where the cautionary language is reasonably specific as opposed to generic or boilerplate so as to constitute a real warning to investors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named In re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In Re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2006-06-14· cited 29×
• In re Veeco Instruments Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2005-10-12· cited 16×
• In Re Veeco Instruments Inc. Securities Litigation
  Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation· 2005-08-22