Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 5/7/1998

Chance v. Armstrong

Citations

  • 143 F.3d 698
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal was inappropriate when appellant alleged that a course of treatment was prescribed because of a monetary incentive
  • holding that a “mere disagreement over the proper treatment” is not actionable under Section 1983
  • holding that a “mere disagreement over the proper treatment” is not actionable under Section 1983
  • holding that a “mere disagreement over the proper treatment” is not actionable under Section 1983
  • holding that a “mere disagreement over the proper treatment” is not actionable under § 1983
  • holding that, in determining the seriousness of a condition, a court should consider the existence of chronic and substantial pain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

211 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.