E.D. New York· 10/5/2015
Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Citations
- 311 F.R.D. 29
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137034
- 2015 WL 5781541
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the plaintiff consumers in various class actions “allege that they paid a premium for ‘flusha-ble’ wipes” in part because the wipes were advertised as “flushable”
- noting that when deciding whether to stay or dismiss, “the paramount concern is that the deferral not work as a time-bar” (quoting Johnson v. Nyack Hosp., 86 F.3d 8, 11 (2d Cir. 1996))
- discussing the preemption of New York’s prohibition on class actions seeking statutory damages by the federal rules
- referring “[t]he issue of an appropriate definition of ‘flushable’ wipes and related issues” to the FTC and staying the case pending those proceedings
- staying its decision on class certification, but noting that it “would give favorable consideration to certifying a 23(b)(2
- finding commonality where plaintiffs alleged a price premium injury stemming from the labeling of wipes as “flushable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mantikas ex rel. Situated v. Kellogg Co.Second Circuit· 2018-12-11· cited 152×
- Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-09-19· cited 60×
- Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLCE.D. New York· 2017-08-01· cited 57×
- Davis v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc.E.D. New York· 2018-04-03· cited 55×
- Berni v. Barilla S.P.A. v. SchulmanSecond Circuit· 2020-07-08· cited 51×
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.E.D. New York· 2017-03-27· cited 48×
- Canale v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.S.D. New York· 2017-06-23· cited 46×
- Daniel v. Mondelez Int'l, Inc.E.D. New York· 2018-02-26· cited 43×
- Bowring v. Sapporo U.S.A., Inc.E.D. New York· 2017-02-10· cited 28×
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-10-04· cited 28×
- City of Perry v. Procter & Gamble Co.S.D. New York· 2016-05-19· cited 21×
- Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.E.D. New York· 2019-02-27· cited 18×
- Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.E.D. New York· 2015-10-22· cited 16×
- In re Dial Complete Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationD. New Hampshire· 2015-12-08· cited 14×
- Reed v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.E.D. New York· 2018-08-24· cited 12×
- Hughes v. Ester C Co., NBTYE.D. New York· 2016-09-30· cited 12×
- In re Kind LLC \Healthy & All Natural\ Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2018-03-02· cited 10×
- In re Amla Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2018-07-31· cited 9×
- Armstrong v. Costco Wholesale Corp.E.D. New York· 2017-02-17· cited 4×
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.E.D. New York· 2016-06-28· cited 2×
Cites
93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,834×
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court· 2013-03-27· cited 1,534×
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court· 2013-02-27· cited 1,424×
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-14· cited 1,009×
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 848×
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Second Circuit· 2010-10-27· cited 803×
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 660×
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 619×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court· 1972-03-01· cited 553×
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-07· cited 497×
- Orlander v. Staples, Inc.Second Circuit· 2015-09-16· cited 442×
- In Re \Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Second Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 411×
- Robidoux v. CelaniSecond Circuit· 1993-03-10· cited 379×
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 373×
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1999-10-26· cited 346×
- Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool CorporationSixth Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 325×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.