Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/2/1989
In re Spencer
Citations
- 152 Vt. 330
- 566 A.2d 959
- 1989 Vt. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “although the purposes of Act 250 are broad, its application is not without limitation”
- rejecting argument that jointly owned parcel was separate and distinct from individually owned parcel for jurisdictional purposes
- legislative ratification of agency's interpretation of own authority must be enforced by courts
- legislative ratification of agency’s interpretation of own authority must be enforced by courts
- under Act 250, automatic issuance of permit in one part of statute and absence of same provision in another part of the statute shows that Legislature did not intend automatic issuance in the latter
- “[T]he fact that § 6085(d) allows for automatic issuance of a permit under certain circumstances illustrates that the Legislature knew how to provide for a remedy if it chose to. The absence of a similar express provision in § 6086(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Barney, Dooley, Gibson, Peck, Ret
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Caledonian-Record Publishing Co. v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-02· cited 46×
- Nash v. Warren Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-10-06· cited 30×
- In re Stokes Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-07-21· cited 27×
- In Re BarlowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-08-13· cited 25×
- State v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-07-14· cited 24×
- In Re Spring Brook Farm Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-10-27· cited 23×
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-21· cited 22×
- In Re Shenandoah LLCSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-07-01· cited 19×
- Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-12-01· cited 18×
- Daniels v. Vermont Center for Crime Victims ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-12-17· cited 14×
- In Re RusinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-06-10· cited 12×
- In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-08-06· cited 11×
- Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.Second Circuit· 1990-12-18· cited 7×
- In re GarageSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-06-26· cited 6×
- Robitaille v. RubinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-07-17· cited 4×
- Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250Vermont Superior Court· 2016-04-12
- NE Materials Group, LLC Act 250Vermont Superior Court· 2015-12-23
- Baldwin Property Act 250 JOVermont Superior Court· 2010-05-06
- Shenandoah LLC JOVermont Superior Court· 2009-09-11
- Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLCVermont Superior Court· 2006-08-03
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-11-09· cited 344×
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-03-25· cited 77×
- In Re McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-12-06· cited 35×
- In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-10-07· cited 31×
- Preston v. ChabotSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-02-07· cited 29×
- Leno v. MeunierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1965-04-06· cited 28×
- City of Rutland v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-10-11· cited 23×
- State v. YudichakSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-10-31· cited 20×
- Chaplis v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-08-28· cited 18×
- Bellows Falls Trust Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-09-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.