Skip to main content

Cooper v. Cooper

Citations

  • 783 A.2d 430
  • 173 Vt. 1
  • 2001 Vt. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that purpose of punitive damages is to respond to “truly reprehensible conduct” (quotation omitted)
  • allowing damages for emotional distress where acts supporting breach of fiduciary duty by cotenant were intentional
  • contrasting Restatement approach under § 874 cmt. c, attaching liability for \knowingly assisting\ breach of fiduciary duty, to the approach taken under § 876(b)
  • upholding punitive damages award in emotional distress claim where there was evidence that defendants breach of fiduciary duty in foreclosure of mortgage was motivated by desire to retaliate against former daughter in law for divorcing their son
  • affirming punitive award in a breach of fiduciary-duty action arising from wrongful foreclosure by former father-in-law in scheme to oust his son’s ex-wife from cotenancy in retaliation for her gaining custody of children, perceived mistreatment of his son, and alienation of grandchildren
  • punitive damages claim unsustainable on evidence that defendant’s acts wrongful or unlawful without additional proof of defendant’s bad spirit and wrong intention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.