Skip to main content
· 12/6/1985

In Re McDonald's Corp.

Citations

  • 505 A.2d 1202
  • 146 Vt. 380
  • 1985 Vt. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to apply equitable estoppel where information given by regional engineer that Act 250 permit not required was merely advisory
  • outlining elements of estoppel, including knowledge of the facts by the party to be estopped, intent that the party’s conduct will be acted on, ignorance of the true facts by the other party, and reliance
  • regional engineer of environmental conservation agency acted beyond his power and authority in rendering opinion concerning possible Act 250 jurisdiction
  • “Estoppels against the government are rare and are to be invoked only in extraordinary circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Hayes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.