Skip to main content
· 3/25/1982

In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.

Citations

  • 444 A.2d 1349
  • 141 Vt. 68
  • 1982 Vt. LEXIS 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the Court will uphold the “construction of statutes by those charged with their execution . . . unless there are compelling indications that the construction is wrong”
  • reversing Board's interpretation of terms \plan\ and \construction of improvements\ where the demolition of a building was not tied to any plan for construction
  • reversing Board’s interpretation of terms “plan” and “construction of improvements” where the demolition of a building was not tied to any plan for construction
  • upholding validity of administratively adopted rule where it will not compromise intent of statute that authorized it
  • striking down a rule of the State Environmental Board as overbroad
  • Act 250 development jurisdiction triggered only when a project “has achieved such finality of design that construction can be said to be ready to commence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Larrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.